idiots
Israel's deputy defense minister, Matan Vilnai, let the cat out of the bag and exposed the Israeli Final Solution to the Gaza problem for all the world to see:
"The more Qassam [rocket] fire intensifies and the rockets reach a longer range, they will bring upon themselves a bigger shoah because we will use all our might to defend ourselves," Matan Vilnai, Israel's deputy defence minister, told army radio.
Shoah is the Hebrew word normally reserved to refer to the Jewish Holocaust. It is rarely used in Israel outside discussions of the Nazi extermination of Jews during the second world war, and many Israelis are loath to countenance its use to describe other events.
My, my, my.
The comparison of zionists to Nazis is complete, and no false cries of "anti-Semitism" can be claimed (unless you want to consider Vilnai an anti-Semite, which I certainly do, where Semite = Arab = Palestinian).
Henceforth, zionist = Nazi, and Nazi = zionist. They are one in the same, cut from the same cloth. No amount of backtracking will suffice. The illusion has been shattered. The zionists have forever branded themselves as Nazis. Like a victim of child abuse who matures into a pedophile, they have assumed the role of their victimizers and have become them.
Heil Olmert! Heil Sharon! Heil Ben Gurion!
HEIL! HEIL! HEIL!!!
Here's the problem with these silly caucuses that everyone is focusing on while the world burns. The first ones (Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina) are held in small, insignificant states whose voters tend to swing to the extremes of the political spectrum. Coupled with low turnouts (something like 12% of Iowans participated) the results don't necessarily reflect the viability of any particular candidate, especially when the so-called "debates" we've had over the past several years (it seems like it's been that long anyway) generally focus on the "mainstream" candidates and marginalize lesser known candidates that may have good ideas. So by the time we get to Iowa, you have the spectacle of Christian Evangelicals (America's version of the Taliban) piling on to hand a "victory" to Huckabee, who, if elected, will make George Bush's Jesus-drenched presidency seem secular. And on the other side, an inexperienced shmo like Barak Obama gets the pole position. And while it's great to see the dreams and aspirations of superficial jack-asses like Romney, Giuliani and Hillary(TM) get crushed, the results are overall pretty meaningless. Meanwhile, any potential for a third party to make any headway is precluded by the fact that the media seems to think we are exclusively a two-party system.
So now we move on to New Hampshire, which in 2000 picked John McCain as the Republican front-runner, the "maverick" who eventually healed to his masters and came to give a speech at Liberty University, the breeding hive of Christian Evangelicals, all in the name of kissing major ass for votes. Liberty University, you may recall, was founded by Jerry Falwell, the same guy that McCain labeled an "agent of intolerance" during his 2000 campaign. If you're going to go that low, you may as well promise to suck some caucus for votes. At least that would be more dignified. Anyway, it should also be noted that NH chose Kerry in 2004. So much for that "libertarian" reputation, though given the choices the Democrats presented that year you can't really blame them (picking "None of the Above" would've been more appropriate).
After New Hampshire, we return to the muck and mire of a majority Evangelical Christian state, South Carolina, where voters are easily swayed by robo-dialers telling harrowing tales of prostitutes and illegitimate black babies. Look for a repeat of this tactic by Huckabee because, yes, he does take South Carolinians for fools, and I'm convinced once the big black caucas spews its load all over SC, his strategy will come to be vindicated. And can you blame him? If all you have to do is pander to the racist, white-power constituency with a cheap whisper campaign then why not? There's still almost a year of campaigning ahead of you, and people will have forgotten about your dirty tricks by the time Super Tuesday rolls around.
And so it is that by the time the first three primaries are done, we are generally left with Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle Dumber as our presidential candidates as the minority of voters who inhabitat the fringes of the political spectrum in these otherwise marginal states tell us who they would prefer to drive our country further into the abyss, and the press proceeds to put their stamp of approval on the front runners coming out of the primaries and almost exclusively focus on them. And we wonder why we keep ending up with candidates that present us with a moral dilemma when we go to the polls.
On the bright side, Ron Paul placed 5th, and going into Hew Hampshire, given the proclivity of that state's citizens to identify as libertarians (if not in label then in ideal) he should do well there, probably better than in Iowa. I'll go out on a limb and predict at least a third place finish there.
Ron Paul, Bitches!
Here's the latest genius scheme by the Israelis:
Olmert says "war" on militants in Gaza to continue (Reuters)
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Sunday ruled out dialogue with Hamas Islamists who control the Gaza Strip and vowed to press on with the army's "war" against militants firing cross-border rockets into Israel.
Olmert's closest confidant said Israel's strategic goal was to topple the Hamas government in the coastal territory through continued military and economic pressure.
Yeah, great strategy, MacArthur! Let's create a Mogadishu right next door to us. Because that's exactly what Israel needs: an ungoverned, arms-saturated failed state right on its border.
Is anyone paying attention to this? How many more stupid things must Israeli leaders do or say before we cut off aid completely?
On a side note, I get so sick of reading this crap all the time. From the same article:
Olmert appeared to play down prospects of a ceasefire deal with Hamas, which seized control of Gaza in June after routing forces loyal to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
Hamas did not "seize control" from Abbas. Hamas pre-emptively struck at the Fatah forces that were being armed and trained by Israeli and American puppetmasters to stage a coup and seize control from Hamas, which was, and still is, the democratically elected leadership of the Palestinians. I am so god damn tired of shoddy reporting like this, and its not just Reuters: you read it in the AP, in the New York Times (possibly the worst offender), Yahoo! News, and in just about every major news organization that covers world events. I can only assume the so-called "reporters" who write these articles are either cynically lazy at best or paid propagandists at worst as it sometimes seems they just look up the current talking points issued by the Bush administration and incorporate them into their articles by rote. No wonder the public is losing confidence in the press, and even the press itself is none to proud of their own work.
Of course, the real reason for Israel's problems, the OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE, is neglected until the end of the article:
"If the occupation commits itself to stopping all forms of aggression against our people, only then the factions may discuss this issue. But until then, there is no discussion among the factions over a calm," Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri said.
I have been doing a little social study with the recent influx of Tottenites that have infested the blog. Rotten Totten has made the claim--without providing any supporting evidence--that I was "terrorizing" his blog, and his army of armchair idiots simply accepted it at face value and swarmed over here like locusts. No proof, no details, just accusations. It reminds me of and is pertinent to the Iranian nuke issue: the US has put forth plentiful propositions of perfidy on the part of the Persians, but has proffered no proof of their presumptuously pernicious project. Yet as my blog entry of October 30 reminds us, 52% of Americans sampled in that particular poll believe the claims of the Bush regime that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, the same administration that promised us nine ways til Sunday that Saddam Hussein had re-constituted his WMD program and was months, nay WEEKS!, away from developing a nuclear weapon. The Tottenistas are representative of the 52% of sheep that bring shame on themselves for being fooled yet a second (third? fourth? fifth?) time.
It goes deeper than that. Demonization as a propaganda tool is effective only when you have an audience that is willing to abandon any rationality they may have had and simply default to the basest, most thuggish instincts of human emotion: sheer, raw hatred. And not rational hatred, but hatred based on fear and ignorance; a cowardly hatred. The comments that have been posted like so many chicken droppings are instructive to this end. A sampling:
It is your ilk that is behind the sweeping totalitarianism you have deluded yourself into believing is a reliegion. May Allah and the rest of you sand monkeys take a long needed dirt nap!
you are a toothless pork eating terrorist in a g-string and hooker boots.
YOU FUCKING COWARDS! YOU GODDAMNED SAND FUCKING NIGGERS! FUCK YOU RIGHT UP THE ASS WITH ALLAHS PRICK. YOU ARE THE BIGGEST FUCKING ASSHOLES THE WORLD HAS EVER KNOWN. AMERICA SHITS UP YOU MAMA'S NASTY CUNT HOLE. FUCK OFF AND DIE DICKHEADS!
FUCK YOU AND MOHAMED!!! I think was he gay anyway. Sheep loving bitch.
hehe, another GOATFUCKER opened a blog...
THere are no such people as the Paleo-stinkian
It is about nothing more than simple racism and bigotry, and Totten predictably attracts the worst of the bunch, which is to say the same cretins that inhabit the dens of intolerance of the likes of Little Green Footballs, as but one example. These people, their psyches irreversibly damaged by the 9/11 attacks, exploited that tragedy as an opportunity to express their true colors, which is an unadulterated and deep-seated intolerance for those that they don't understand and therefore ignorantly fear. We see them here in their full, cacophonous glory, braying like a pack of frightened jack-asses. These people are the true enemies of America. They are a cancer on our society. Oblivious to the ills that our disastrous foreign policy has sown for several decades through our support of brutally unjust and viciously dictatorial regimes, their reaction to the destruction we reaped in return could only be explained to them and subsequently understood in egregiously disinformative summations: they hate us because of our freedom.
Naturally, these people adopt as their champions those of a similar disposition and mentality (and of equally low intellect, since they fear even the slightest indication of erudition). Totten reminds me of the character of Dirk Diggler in the movie Boogie Nights: a legend in his own mind and surrounded by a cast of equally mediocre but fawning cohorts who constantly affirm their belief in his "talent", which consists of nothing more than shooting his wad, while in reality he's nothing but a doped-up loser from the suburbs.
I took some time to locate pertinent examples of Totten's total ignorance of Arabs and Islam, his topic of main focus, but fortunately didn't have to spend very much time since he produces gems of idiocy on a regular basis. The most recent is this:
Lots of Arabs drink coffee, but he's right that Iraqis do not. They have a tea culture here.
Right. Iraqis, the vast majority of them Arabs, do not drink coffee. You know, that drink whose name is derived from the Arabic word qahwa. Oh, Totten. I know you're on a "freelance observer's"* budget, but Wikipedia is free to use.
And here's a nugget:
Pelosi is a fool. She knows not what she does, as evidenced by the fact that she wore a headscarf to meet with the Alawite-Baathist regime. Alawites are not Muslims, and the Assad regime fears and loathes conservative Islam.
It's good to know that I, an Alawite, am not a Muslim. Perhaps I might finally gain acceptance from some of Totten's more bigoted fan base.
What a cretin. This is a gaffe that rivals that of Imam Charles Johnson. Next time, save yourself the embarrassment and just fucking Google it. Something as simple as a Wikipedia search would've given you a clue, if you'd had any sense at all. But of course, Totten seems to fancy himself an Orientalist, and like most who qualify themselves with that colonialist era title, his is a shallow understanding of Arab and Muslim culture and history, usually that which is picked up anecdotally from other Orientalists.
I can't be bothered to find more examples at the moment, but really, is it even necessary? With the above two glaring examples, I submit it is not.
Finally, "popinjay". Nope, sorry, I don't watch Bill O'Reilly (and I don't understand why anyone would think I would). I copped it from George Galloway, from whom O'Reilly likely cribbed it. It's appropriate, since Galloway invoked it in a debate with Christopher Hitchens, whom Totten apparently idolizes.
Anyway, you monkeys can leave now. There's nothing here of interest to you, and I'll only make you angrier every time I post something. Save your slander and bile for someone who gives a shit.
* That's how one of your fanboys described you
UPDATE:
A kind reader provided more examples of Tottenism:
Documented here is a typical Israeli tactic for avoiding any actual movement towards peace negotiations: Israel's Barak dismisses peace push "fantasies" Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak was quoted as saying on Friday that talk of any peace deal with the Palestinians anytime soon was a "fantasy", in a challenge to U.S.-led efforts to revive negotiations. In private conversations reported by Israel's Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, Barak said he would not carry out plans by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to remove roadblocks in the West Bank as a gesture to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. The Israeli version of the "good cop/bad cop" routine has played out in endless permutations since the Israeli virus first infected the region. Just change the pertinent pronouns ("Ehud Barak", "Ehud Olmert", etc.) and fill in the date. This is the basic formula for Israeli intransigence: one Israeli politician playing off the other, one portraying the earnest Man of PeaceTM, the other the valiant Defender of Israel fending off the Arab hoardes, and then after the press conference they head over to the bar together to toast their collective performance. It's always the same, and it reveals the true intent of the Zionists, which is to eventually take over all of Palestine, before turning its sights beyond. Barak, who as prime minister spearheaded talks with the Palestinians that ended in failure in 2001, was quoted in Yedioth as saying a peace deal would not be possible for at least three to five years. [Emphasis added] Barak said that is how much time would be needed for Israel to develop defenses against rockets, which Palestinian militants regularly fire into southern Israel from the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip. Instead of working towards peace, which would put an end to the rocket attacks, Barak wants to first try military means, which never worked before and, short of relocating Israel to Siberia, will not happen ever. So, how dumb are we? The answer will be revealed in three to five years.
Continuing the emasculation of Tony Bliar, Coondelozer Rice further pared down his involvement in the Middle East "peace process" by specifying he is to be an "envoy" to the Palestinians and "would work on raising funds for the Palestinians, as well as building their economy and infrastructure." This is the expected precursor to ultimately defining Bliar's title as Official Fetcher of Erasers and White-Out. It's like the Palestinians now have their very own Shimon Peres, i.e. an expired politician getting paid to fill a primarily symbolic position to keep him busy into retirement.
Coon went on to describe Bliar's now mostly ceremonial position as "something that is completely complementary and if we all work together, and there is plenty to do, perhaps we can finally deliver," she said. Well, unless she's planning on delivering blow jobs to Mahmoud Abbas, I'm understandably skeptical that adding Tony Bliar to the mix will enable them to deliver anything much more. Quite frankly, Bliar is much better at sucking ass.
And since Tony now ostensibly represents the Palestinians, he'll of course "meet Ehud Olmert, the Israeli prime minister, in Jerusalem before meeting Mr. Abbas and his new government in Ramallah." Because when you're appointed to represent the Palestinians, it's considered customary to first meet with the Israelis and receive their terms of surrender and subjugation that you will then present to Mahmoud.
So when someone accuses Jews of being "Nazis", it's considered anti-Semitic. But when Jews call Palestinians "terrorists", it's...not considered anti-Semitic.
Okay.
P.S. Speaking of "anti-Semitism", it's been about a month and nobody has answered my challenge of finding even one example of anti-Jewish comments on the totality of The Hypocalypse. Therefore, the blog will remain.
|